Some error occured while loading the Quick View. Please close the Quick View and try reloading the page.
The monograph analyzes international relations in the Arctic from two perspectives: cooperation and competition. The following question was asked: does rivalry outweigh cooperation in the Arctic or is it the other way round; do the entities manage to gain the benefits of cooperation?
The authors pose the hypothesis that States and the Arctic actors should cooperate with each other in the light of the prisoner’s dilemma of obtaining tangible benefits, but the more probable, and definitely more possible variant of absence of such a cooperation or breaking the cooperation is rivalry, which in the short-term gives an advantage over other players, but in the long-term causes losses.
Roman S. Czarny, Ph.D.ssistant Professor at the Department of Law and Social Sciences of the Jan Kochanowski University in Kielce.;
Magdalena Tomala, Ph.DAssociate Professor at the Department of Law and Social Sciences at the Jan Kochanowski University in Kielce.
Iwona Wrońska, Ph.DProfessor of Political Science at the Jan Kochanowski University in Kielce.
Chapter 1. Setting up the Stage: The North American Arctic
Chapter 2. Leading Players in The North American Arctic
Chapter 3. The North American Arctic Games: Between Cooperation and Rivalry